Matej Pavsic    Home Page

Here are short descriptions of selected hot topics

For formal descriptions see papers
 

Old brane world and new brane world
 

 


  • Negative energies and stability
  •  Contrary to the widespread belief, negative energies do not automatically imply instabilities and runaway behavior of physical systems.





A system with positive and negative energies is stable  if the interaction potential is bounded from below and from above.

Realistic potentials do not extend to infinity, therefore  a system is stable even if it admits negative energy degrees of freedom



 

 

  • Faster than light motion
  • On 23 September 2011, CERN reported the finding of  faster than light muon neutrinos. If this is confirmed, then there will be a need to consider a suitable modification of the theory of relativity.  Here let me point out that there already exist several theories that allow for fasten that light motion, and they all contain the Einstein's special relativity as a special case.


    a) The extended special theory of relativity with superluminal transformations (E. Recami, et al.).
    As an undergraduate student I also considered such a theory and wrote a paper The Extended Special Theory of Relativity. A shorter version was published in the Slovenian journal Obzornik za Matematiko in Fiziko 19, 20 (1973).
    I discuss faster than light particles, amongst many other  things, in my book "The Landscape of Theoretical Physics" (Kluwer, 2001, http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0610061 ),  and also propose how the causality issue can be resolved.

    b) Higher dimensional spaces with with extra time like and  space like dimensions (signature (p,q)).
    In a subspace with signature (1,3) (the Minkowski spacetime), particles can move faster than light. A particular case is the Clifford space (C-space) with signature (8,8). I proposed such explanation of faster than light motion in paper "Clifford space as the arena for physics", Foundations of Physics 33 (2003) 1277, http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:gr-qc/0211085 .
    This paper is reviewed in Progr. Phys. Prog.Phys. 1 (2005) 31-64 (with C. Castro).

    c) Phase space  (the papers by Carlos Castro).

    d) The Stueckelberg theory with an invariant evolution parameter also predicts faster than light particles.

    The approaches a), b) and d) are considered together in Localized Propagating Tachyons in Extended Relativity Theories  Adv.Appl.Clifford Algebras 23 (2013) 469-495  DOI:10.1007/s00006-013-0381-9  arXiv:1201.5755 [hep-th].


Faster than light motion is possible in several already existing theories that are straightforward generalizations of the Einstein's relativity.
Causality paradoxes of tachyons can be resolved in the same way as David Deutsch resolved the time travel paradoxes of wormholes:  By conisdering multiverse and the Everett interpretation of quantum mechanics.


       

  • Space  inversion of spinors revisited: A possible explanation of chiral behavior in weak interactions
  • We  investigate a model in which spinors are considered as being embedded within the Clifford algebra that operates on them. In Minkowski space M_{1,3}, we have four independent 4-component spinors, each living in a different minimal left ideal of Cl(1,3). We show that under space inversion, a spinor of one left ideal transforms into a spinor of another left ideal. This brings novel insight to the role of chirality in weak interactions. We demonstrate the latter role  by considering an action for a generalized spinor field \psi^{\alpha i} that has not only a spinor index \alpha but also an extra index i running over four ideals. The covariant derivative of \psi^{\alpha i} contains the generalized spin connection, the extra components of which are interpreted as the SU(2) gauge fields of weak interactions and their generalization. We thus arrive at a system that is left-right symmetric due to the presence of a ``parallel sector", postulated a long time ago, that contains mirror particles coupled to mirror SU(2) gauge fields.

    Space inversion of spinors revisited: A possible explanation of chiral behavior in weak interactions   
    Physics Letters B  692 , 212-217  (2010)
     


Spinors are elements of 4 independent minimal left ideals of Cl(1,3).
Under space inversion, a spinor of one left ideal transforms into a spinor of another left ideal. This brings novel insight to the role of chirality in weak interactions.
 


  • A novel view on the physical origin of E8
  • The exceptional group E8 can arise in 16-dimensional Clifford space, a manifold whose tangent space is Clifford algebra Cl(1,3). The latter space besides an algebra is also a vector space V_{8,8} whose elements can be rotated into each other by means of the generators of SO(16) (or one of its non compact forms). The vectors of V_{8,8} generate Clifford algebra Cl(8,8) which contains the Lie algebra of E8 as a subspace. E8 thus arises from the fact that, just as in the spacetime M_4 there are r-volumes, r=0,1,2,3,3, generated by the the tangent vectors of the spacetime, there are R-volumes, R=0,1,2,...,16, in the Clifford space C, generated by the tangent vectors of C.

    A novel view on the physical origin of E8   
    Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 41332001-10  (2008)
     


E8 naturally occurs in the 16-dimesnional Clifford  space
No need for extra dimensions of spacetime ! The "extra dimensions" are in C-space. This is a quenched configuration space associated with extended objects.
 



Kaluza-Klein theory in Curved 16-dimesnional Clifford  space
No need for extra dimensions of spacetime !
 

  • On the Reconciliation between the (Unconstrained) Stueckelberg  theory and the (Constrained) Relativity

  • I have found that the currently fashionable ideas about the Heisenberg picture (as being more fundamental than the Schroedinger picture) are quite in agreement with what I say about quantum mechanics and the (Lorentz) invariant evolution parameter $\tau$. One only needs to ``slightly" enlarge spacetime. Instead of 4-dimensional spacetime one has to take 16-dimensional Clifford space, i.e., the space of p-loops that enclose p+1-areas (0-loops being the ordinary points). [See the papers by C.Castro,  W. Pezzaglia, M. Pavsic,  and  A.Aurilia et.al..] Here I see a possible connection to the loop approach to quantum gravity.] In Clifford space we have the constrained theory, no evolution, Heisenberg picture, etc., whilst in spacetime we have a reduced, unconstrained, theory with evolution (as considered by Fock, Stueckelberg, Feynman, Horwitz, and others). In Clifford space (shortly  C-space) 16 components of momentum are constrained to a generalized mass shell, whilst in spacetime four components of the ordinary 4-momentum can be considered as being unconstrained (since we are considering a reduced theory, a reduced action). Upon Gupta-Bleuler quantization the constraint becomes the Klein-Gordon equation in C-space. Upon quantization of the reduced action we obtain the  Schroedinger equation in the reduced space (a subspace of which is 4-dimensional spacetime).  In fact, the Schroedinger equation in the reduced space is a  generalized Stueckelberg equation and it contains the ordinary Stueckelberg equation as a special case). Moreover the Fock-Schwinger proper time formalism is widely recognized as a very useful tool. It contains a ``fictitious" evolution parameter $\tau$. In my scheme the latter parameter is not fictitious, it is a genuine evolution parameter. The same evolution parameter would also appear in a generalization of the theory that would take into account the dynamics of  the metric tensor. 
    This provides a resulution of the notorious ``problem of time'' in quantum gravity.

    All the nice features of relativity (such as reparametrization invariance, ``block universe", Heisenberg picture, Lorentz transformations, etc.) still hold: not in spacetime, but in C-space. What is nice here is that we have not added extra dimensions to spacetime. We have merely considered the geometric structure, the Clifford bundle, that sits at every point of spacetime.

    There exists a paper ``Quantum Entanglement in Time" (by C. Brukner at al.) eprint quant-ph/0402127   in which the authors have found a very strange connection between past and future: the very act of measuring the photon polarization a second time can affect how it was polarized earlier on (see also ``The weirdest link", New Scientist, 27 March 2004, p.32). They suggest that ``the difference between the spatial and temporal structure may ultimately be fundamental, or it may be an indication that we need a deeper theory in which the two need to be treated on a more equal footing (quantum field theory does not suffice in this sense).'' A ``deeper'' theory is considered in my works on the Stueckelberg theory briefly described above.  For more information see papers on Relativistic Dynamics   , book , and papers on Clifford algebra.   Namely, the essence of the Stueckelberg theory, as investigated in my works,  is that space and the so called coordinate time are indeed treated on a more equal footing.  In addition, in the Stueckelberg theory there occurs yet another time, the so called evolution time. Therefore, in the Stueckelberg theory two kinds  of   entanglement in time are theoretically possible: that due to Bruckenr at al. (which is now the entanglement in evolution time), and the entanglement in spacetime (which is analogous to the usual entanglement).


Stueckelberg theory (which involves an invariant evolution parameter) is embedded in C-space relativity.
Theory of relativity is supposed to hold in C-space.
In Minkowski space we have the unconstrained Stueckelberg theory.

In Minkowski space we do not have "block universe".  Block universe is in C-space, whilst in M4 we have evolution: Configuration of events in M4 may change with $tau$. The true distinction between past and future is in C-space
(where the generalized light cone is defined).

 

The true time is $tau$ , a coordinate of C-space. 

The time and space coordinates x0, x1, x2, x3 of  M4 are treated on the same footing.

 

  • On  the quantization ambiguities in curved spaces 
  •  

    If we define momentum operator geometrically as gradient (derivative)  being basis vectors, then the Hamiltonian H (which is proportional to the square of p) is unambiguously defined even in curved space. There is no ordering ambiguity. (Class. Quant. Grav. Vol. 20 (2003) 2697-2714)

    The expectation value for the momentum operator in curved space Vn is defined straightforwardly.
    The expecation value for the momentum operator follows a geodetic curve Vn
    Momentum operator is Hermitian with respect to the  scalar product in the definition of which enter the basis vectors  .

    We have shown that -using the formalism of Clifford algebra- the intergation over a vector field in curved space is well defined : Vectors at different points  x of  Vn   are  all brought together into a chosen point x' by means of parallel transport along the geodesic joining x and x'. Usage of the generators of Clifford algebra as basis vectors enables to write such integral in a very compact notation (see paper)

    An illustration of such vector integral for the case of sphere is given here:   Html     Pdf     Ps    Ppt 
    A demonstration of the transition to the case of  flat space  is given here:  Html   or Ppt .
     
     
     
     


Quantization ambiguities do not arise if operators are defined geometrically, e.g., by employing generators of Clifford algebra in their definition.

 


Expectation for momentum operator follows geodetic line.

Integration over a vector field in  Vn  can be given a well defined geometrical meaning.
Vectors are transported to a chosen point where they are summed  (integrated).

Matej Pavsic
Go to Home Page

Continues
Page under construction